This week in class we talked about neo-conservatism and what
it means including examples from the readings we have done and the article we
had to read about neo-conservatism. The way I see neo-conservatism is that it
has some liberalism aspects. I decided to look for an article that would talk
about the current issues and may have included neo-conservatism. To my surprise
The Washington Post had a recent article (September 13, 2012) about how presidential
candidate Mitt Romney avoids the talk about neo-conservatism and everything
dealing with this topic. This includes the war in Iraq
that has been going on for years because America
saw them as a threat; which is a neo-conservatism way to see the situation. The
article tells how he (Romney) makes his speeches avoiding the topics of Iraq,
the soldiers that are over there fighting the war and the issues that have risen
about the murdering of the U.S ambassador of America
in Libya. Not only
does he not talk about the important issues that America
has with other countries, he also bad talks our former President Obama. Romney
is not clear about his perspectives in many things like neo-conservatism but
not only that, but also the economy here in the USA.
By not talking about the war in Iraq,
Romney is showing the people of America
that he has no plan if he does become president and will not try to stop or
think about it with the importance that it does have. To me neo-conservatism is
important because depending on this, USA
may be in danger, and we do not want a president that has no plan if that is
ever the case in the next four years.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment